Jim Besser

I know what you mean. I'm not fond of playing in Gm on my CG - limited chording options for harmonic playing - but to my ear, Gm tunes often sound particularly pleasing. I"m not sure why this might be - how different is Gm from Am? - but there you have it.

How do I get on in F? Unhappily, mostly. I have 30 button CGs. Playing melody in F generally is fine; doing good chords and bass runs in F is a skill I have yet to master.

The Dipper Shantyman low F/C is back at the Button Box - it's second or third go-round there, I believe. I've played a lot of fine concertinas over the years, but nothing to compare to this beauty. The tone is low, very organ-like, deeply resonant; the action is buttery smooth. If I had more use for an F/C - and an extra $8000 lying around - I would buy it in an instant.

Be patient - Frank is busy with a number of hobbies and projects. But he's a good guy to do business with.

I played a prototype, years ago, and liked it. Last month, Frank brought a more recent one to the Northeast Squeeze In, and I had a short go on it. I am not an Irish player, but I can say this: the one I played is an excellent instrument - fast, great action and very light. The sound was clearly that of a traditional reeded instrument (there were Edgley hybrids among attendees, and the difference was very clear). Frank played a set for the evening concert, and I thought the sound was great. I don't know if it's the right instrument for you, but from my vantage point, it is an excellent concertina well suited to fast Irish playing.

Thanks, that's all useful information. And you're absolutely right about quality mics. Over they years I've tried all kinds of arrangements - the Microvox, 1 or 2 SM57s, etc. - but the best sound I ever had was with a single KSM 137 in the hands of a real pro. My hope with my new 137 is that I can improve sound, reduce feedback - and make setup as simple as possible. I want to play music, not fiddle endlessly with equipment and get tangled up in cables and beltpacks! And at my next gig, I'm going to use the hybrids. What I've realized is that while the sound of a Jeffries is bliss to me, dancers in a crowded, noisy hall, hearing the music thru a big PA, can't tell the difference.

Interesting, and it makes sense. That leads me to another question: I frequently hear that systems like the Microvox are particularly susceptible to feedback. Why would stick-on mic be more problematic than mics on stands?

Good theory, Alan! I'm also wondering about the character of the sound: the pure tone of concertina reeds vs. the overtone-laden tone of accordion reeds. As I noted, the difference in feedback was striking. Your experience with condenser mics is interesting. For me, I have two data points. In the big dance hall where we frequently play, the very good sound guy generally sets me up with a single AKG535 condenser mic on a stand, and the sound is pretty good, without a lot of trouble with feedback. He is able to do this with skillful EQ even though he is mostly using old and not top-rank equipment. In two gigs at Washington's Kennedy Center Millennium Stage, where the Microvox clip ons couldn't produce enough output for their system, a single Shure KSM137 produced the best sound I've had: a clear, strong sound without the harshness of the Microvoxs and without feedback.. Of course, a lot of the latter good experience is because they were using top professional gear throughout the system, on an acoustically excellent stage, and because they are sound professionals who have the experience and expertise to deal with hard-to-mic instruments. Which leads to another conclusion: here on c.net, we have discussed the best systems for amplifying a concertina for many years, with no strong consensus about the best approach, and part of the reason is that we are just not sound professionals, and we're generally using less than optimal PA systems. So we're always seeking the magic microphone that can offset our deficiencies. A skillful professional can get good sound out of a variety of mic systems. I'm going to give the Shure a try at an upcoming dance in a very noisy, acoustically hot hall; that should be a good test.

I'll be there; can't wait.

I've used the 2 mics/stands setup many times, and it works, but sound guys tell me there's too much variation in volume as the bellows move in and out. A top sound guy I've worked with - he does both studio and live sound - insists that a single really good mic on a stand over the middle of the bellows is the best solution, although not perfect. My new setup is a single Shure KSM137; the sound tech at a very large venue last year used one when my Microvox failed, and the results were excellent. But my question remains: are accordion reeds inherently less susceptible to feedback than traditional reeds? My recent experience says yes, but I'd be interested in knowing if there's any science to back this up.

Yep, I do that, too. The Tonebone EQ helps. I'm hoping my new setup will be an improvement - a single, high quality condenser mic that several sound techs have used when working with me. What's so frustrating about the Microvox setup is the variability; the same configuration works fine in some halls, terribly in others. I really want to simplify things while working to reduce the feedback problem. Another factor is that I hate getting tangled up with all the cables when using an attached system.

I'm wondering if there is something about the tone produced by accordion reeds that makes them less susceptible to feedback than traditional reeds. Situation: playing at a ceilidh the other night, in a big, acoustically challenging hall with a fairly rudimentary sound system. I was using my usual setup - Microvox clip ons to a Radial Tonebone DI with EQ to the system, with big wedge monitor and several hotspots. It's a very loud band - brass, drums, electric guitar - and my problem is always getting enough volume from the concertina in the monitors , so I can hear myself, without producing feedback. In this instance, I assume the dynamics of the hall made the problem more acute. As an experiment, I switched from the Jeffries anglo - traditional reeds - to a similarly pitched Morse, with accordion reeds. The problem didn't disappear, but I was able to crank up monitor volume on the concertina a few notches without feedback. I was much more able to hear myself. Is there some characteristic of the sound of accordion reeds that might make them less susceptible to feedback than traditional reeds? Is it the more complex, overtoney sound? I'm beginning to think that hybrid concertinas play better with diverse sound systems than traditional reeds. I'm fed up with the variability of the Microvoxes - they work OK in some situations/venues, very poorly in others, and not at all in at least one - for some reason, on some PA systems, the Microvox just doesn't produce enough output. I am switching to a high quality condenser mic that the sound pros at a gig last year used on the concertina with much better results. But I'm also wondering if there are sonic advantages when amplifying the hybrid that outweigh my personal preference for traditional reeds.

I own ceilis and have played Clovers; both are fine instruments that are well suited to what you want to play. The differences are pretty minor. I gravitate to the ceilis because of their light weight and easy playability, but honestly, either one would be great. The Rochelle is a mixed bag; it's better than other super-cheap instruments, but it is a very stiff, awkward instrument; if you progress quickly in ITM, you will outgrow it very fast, and at a Noel Hill session, it would definitely impede your progress. I haven't dealt with the Concertina Connection, so can't comment on their customer service; the Button Box customer service is excellent, and their trade up plan is backed up with a sizeable inventory. The hybrid vs traditional instrument debate is endless. I own and play both, and will say this (again): while my Jeffries is a superb player with the sound I prefer, the Morse boxes (and undoubtedly the Clovers) are more playable and more reliable than a majority of the vintage concertinas I have played over the years. A low-end vintage box may have that classic sound, but chances are it'll be a slower and less reliable instrument. Everything in life involves trade offs. My subjective view is that for most players who have limited budgets, a good hybrid is a better choice than a low priced vintage instrument.

Every instrument has its purists, that's for sure. As for concertinas, good hybrids sound great, good vintage instruments sound great; they're just different. We're really lucky this modern world offers us so many choices. As a side note: when playing, or when I listen to someone else playing my instruments, I perceive a strong difference in sound between my Jeffries GD and my Morse GD. But when recorded, I can't tell which is which, and I know from friends that when I'm playing for dances, thru a big PA system, the differences in sound pretty much disappear.

I had a chance to play Gary's Wolverton, and it is indeed a fine sounding and playing instrument, a welcome addition to the universe of available concertinas. This hybrid-vs-traditional-reeded debate is endless, in part because it is so very subjective. I play both, and like both, for different reasons. And the people I play with have a wide range of opinions about how they sound. Some really can't tell the difference; some prefer the sound of the hybrids, some the sound of the traditional instruments. I gravitate to the traditional side, but when I pick up an instrument to play just for fun, it's generally one of the Morse hybrids. Responding to the OP's question: there is no one-size-fits-all answer. It's a mix of what makes you happiest, what you can afford, what's available. Start with the assumption that the good hybrids (Morse, Wolverton, Edgley, Tedrow, etc.) are every bit as playable as the best vintage instruments, and in many cases may be more mechanically reliable. If you like the sound of the hybrids, and that's what you can afford, the choice is obvious. Personally, I find the sound of a good CG hybrid is very close to the sound produced by a traditional CG instrument; there's much more of a difference between GD hybrids and traditional instruments. One's not better than the other, just different. But again, it's all subjective.