seanc Posted June 15, 2020 Share Posted June 15, 2020 Ok as a follow up to the 21 vs Holmwood thread.. I had taken the advice of the crowd and opted for the 21.. sent my Lachenal and the money to Greg J.. and then something happened on the way to Kentucky . I sold something else. I could now get a 22 that Greg has. It is a good deal of money difference.. and I am NOT a great player at this point. Should I just take the plunge and do it. Or save the money and work up to it? is there an $800 ish difference? But what is the wisdom. Of the sages here? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
W3DW Posted June 15, 2020 Share Posted June 15, 2020 (edited) As the happy owner of a model 21, I have always wondered what the actual differences are to have been worth the significant difference in the original price. Using a 1920s Wheatstone advertisement (the era of my instrument) the Model 22 cost £17 and the Model 21 sold for £11 - quite a difference! "Best nickel plated raised ends" are advertised for the Model 22. A century on, has the plating proved to be superior? Do raised ends sound better or feel better? I sure think they look fine. "Spherical end silver keys and ends to match" sounds fancy, but the Model 21 could be similarly described. Are they different? Then come my "steel vibrators" versus the Model 22 "best steel vibrators". What differentiated them when new? Were they differently manufactured, or perhaps were they all built the same but the Model 22 reeds were carefully selected and prepared? The model 22 had "morocco" bellows which might have also brought better workmanship and better action, but these are likely replaced by this time anyway. And finally, the Model 22 was said to feature a "new improved action, short touch and rapid articulation". We're 21s and 22s internally dissimilar? Of course, the largest differences between the two instruments that seanc is considering is what has happened since each has left the factory - how have they been played, cared for and restored. But I wonder what can be said about the original differences in these two concertinas, and what might be expected of them today. Thanks, all! Daniel Edited June 15, 2020 by W3DW Clarity Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geoff Wooff Posted June 16, 2020 Share Posted June 16, 2020 (edited) Having one of each sitting side by side, taking a good look at the physical differences with an experienced eye would be interesting and Greg is in a position to do this . The general condition of each is one very important factor in the value, also the period of manufacture. The photo on seanc's previous discussion showed a model 21 from a very good period.... perhaps this is generally not taken into account when it comes to value but ..... Other factors like 5 or 6 fold bellows have to be factored in. Edited June 16, 2020 by Geoff Wooff 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stephen Chambers Posted June 16, 2020 Share Posted June 16, 2020 (edited) Perhaps the biggest difference is in the reedpan, which is flat on the 21 (producing a more Anglo-like sound), but tapered on the 22 (producing fuller low notes). The 21 is likely to have cheaper levers made of brass rod, hammered flat in the middle (like a Jeffries, or Crabb), the 22's will be made out of sheet brass, which is stronger. The reeds in the 21 will probably be shorter in scale (making them bighter in sound) than the 22's. You'd be best advised to try the two of them and buy the one you prefer. Personally I like the sound of my 1910 No.6 "Special" the best, because it's warm, rich, and loud, but you might prefer the "honk" of the No.21! Horses for courses... Edited June 16, 2020 by Stephen Chambers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seanc Posted June 16, 2020 Author Share Posted June 16, 2020 1 hour ago, Stephen Chambers said: Perhaps the bigest difference is in the reedpan, which is flat on the 21 (producing a more Anglo-like sound), but tapered on the 22 (producing fuller low notes). The 21 is likely to have cheaper levers made of brass rod, hammered flat in the middle (like a Jeffries, or Crabb), the 22's will be made out of sheet brass, which is stronger. The reeds in the 21 will probably be shorter in scale (making them bighter in sound) than the 22's. You'd be best advised to try the two of them and buy the one you prefer. Personally I like the sound of my 1910 No.6 "Special" the best, because it's warm, rich, and loud, but you might prefer the "honk" of the No.21! Horses for courses... Stephen (and all) this is really helpful. i know that it is near impossible to generalize. Or make a 100% informed decision without hands on side by side comparison. Especially in terms of 100+ years of time, use, wear, care etc. but I am in mass and Greg is in Ky. if action and response is pretty similar. And. 21 can be described as a “honkey Anglo” while sounding pretty politically incorrect and possibly quite racially charged.. that seems to be more inline with what I am Anglo-ing for... I will wait for others including Greg to weigh in.. but that and saving a bunch of cash leans things a bit in the 21 direction.. add to that buying a 21 close to 2021. Gets a pseudo numerology voodoo magic thing going And now I can’t seem to get The Who “So you think 21 is going to be a good year” out of my head.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seanc Posted June 30, 2020 Author Share Posted June 30, 2020 FWIW... the choice actually came down to the 22 or the Holmwood. i opted for the 22. Now I wait for delivery. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Wilson Posted July 3, 2020 Share Posted July 3, 2020 I think you've made the right choice. For many years I had a wheatie 21 and it served me well, but now I have a superior concertina and I'm so glad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seanc Posted July 3, 2020 Author Share Posted July 3, 2020 1 hour ago, Steve Wilson said: I think you've made the right choice. For many years I had a wheatie 21 and it served me well, but now I have a superior concertina and I'm so glad. I am sure that all three would have served me well for a while. But I was lucky enough to have sold a few more things at the right time to stretch for the 22. As I suspect many of us came to the concertina from other instruments. I think many of us, regardless of skill levels have found that we hit a wall in our increasing abilities vs the capabilities of our instruments. I felt I hit that with the Lachenal. And having an AC Norman Anglo, I had a benchmark as to how a concertina could be. The Norman, by contrast, was like a Ferrari. Nimble, fast and expressive with a huge dynamic range. Not having a ton of experience, I have no idea if the Norman is great, good, or poor compared to the population of what is out there. Maybe when the 22 lands I will realize that the Norman is not that exceptional in contrast. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RWL Posted July 6, 2020 Share Posted July 6, 2020 I have a friend who has a Model 22. It is a little louder than my metal ended Edeophone and she tells me her 22 is louder than a mutual friend's metal ended Aeola. I don't know if all 22's are loud though. Greg could advise on that. Loudness of course isn't the only quality that's important to the sound of the instrument though. Playing them would be an important way to decide. Maybe Greg could play the same tune on both and send you the recordings if you can't visit his shop. When I was at NESI last year I had a chance to try some instruments that Greg set up. They were all very responsive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now