Boney Posted November 26, 2010 Share Posted November 26, 2010 You might find it difficult enouqh to find anyone out there who can play just one of them to perfection. "Perfection" is a matter of personal taste, not a measurable, invariant quality. Perfection is like infinity; you can pursue it forever without getting any closer. 'Perfection' is still not a bad thing to aim for. I prefer to aim for excellence.I think it's more realistic and -- for me at least -- more than adequate. No harm in aiming ! "Perfection" is a funny word, one I try not to use. I can't have a visceral connection with it, so I can't "aim" for it. But I can aim for an ideal, that is, a sound I have in my head, how I want something to sound. I know I won't reach that ideal, but I know I can get closer and closer...athough the ideal will evolve over time, too. So if you call that ideal "perfection," then I can't imagine aiming for less, no matter how "excellent" that "less than ideal" may be. How would you decide in what way you wanted to compromise that ideal? Of course, I can aim at one aspect of it at a time, and recognize and value the result when I get closer. But "closer" isn't the aim point. If you're aiming an arrow at a target, it doesn't make sense to aim for "within a few inches of the center." Even if you're happy with that result, you aim for the center anyway, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now