While starting with an inexpensive concertina and moving up to better ones is common, buying the "final" one at the start is near impossible to do. Why? Because most people don't know what they want at the start. Sure we want a superb sounding, highly responsive box in great condition - but of what type, range, sound characteristics...?
Most people don't know/understand attributes like that until they become reasonably seasoned players. And not only does everyone have differing tastes, but people's tastes change over time. I started out on English and wound up with Hayden duet. You might think that anlgo is the only way to go now and decide next year that English really suits you better. Or maybe a brighter sound that is typically had with a metal-ended instrument, or a deeper range, or a lighter box....
I suggest that you purchase one of the hybrid types (as mentioned in this thread - others are available too) in the system you think suits you best, and seems to have the qualities you think you like (at least right now). Then consider price - this range of makers runs from about $1400 to about $2200 for their basic models (beware that some charge extra for the case) and more for "options". Get everything "standard" and give more serious consideration to the lower priced ones as the chance of you moving on is very great. And I don't mean that you'll be getting a MORE expensive concertina next time around - it's just that spending more that you need to *now* might not be the best move for you right now.
Unfortunately there hasn't been an reasonable comparison between this range of makes. You can go to places like NESI and try out several yourself (and get a lot of feedback from players), but that's about it. I would love to have someone take on such a review, and several attempts have been started - and fizzled out. Even here on concertina.net people have been shy and overly sensitive to comparing boxes, saying that such considerations are too "personal" to be meaningful measure.
At the very least I wish someone could compile the "non-personal" aspects: size, weight, wood species, end materials, number of bellows folds and subtlety, action throw and evenness of pressure, etc. Even things like response time and sound volume are measurable. A "Consumer Reports" type of thing... and then get into some personal impressions if they dare. I've personally played and taken apart to inspect at least two of every makers instruments in this range.... but being a maker myself am "exempt" from being a reviewer.
I can also say that a review of this sort won't be as conclusive as one might imagine as most makers make theirs as one-offs, mostly in response to players wishes, meaning that their concertinas wiill differ slightly one from the next. Plus all makers are getting better all the time with some improving so greatly that using a 2-year old model would be most unfair. Still, the overall design/construction from each maker remains fairly constant and would be a good thing to know as it makes a significant difference in the character of each maker's concertinas.
Hi Rich,
Wow! Thanks so much for your detailed response to my questions! It has been amazing to me how willing everybody has been to help me out with their suggestions. I really value your conservative approach and I hope that I can benifit from the wisdom you have shared. When I stated that I planned on purchasing a "final" instrument it was not my intention to completely block out the possibility that I could end up looking in another direction once I became better aquainted with playing the concertina and started to find my personal taste and style. What I am trying to avoid is getting stuck with one that I could not be happy with or that wasn't of good enough quality to last me some time. I want one that is fully capable of making good Irish music and does not come with a lot of built-in limitations. Basically I need a good quality instument on which to get started and that would be of a quality that I could be satified with for years if it happened to fit my desires. I do have some experience with the anglo through some friends who I play Irish music with and that is probably the reason that I have leaned in that direction. However, like you said, I can never be completely sure untill I have had some personal experience.
The type of setting I will be playing in will be almost completely instrumental. So the general type of sound I desire is one that has enough volume to be heard but without drowning out all the softer instruments. From listening to the music played on concertinas I believe my preference would be a tone somewhere in the middle. Some of the brighter ones sound somewhat harsh but if one goes too mellow it seems to get a little lost. If I had to guess, I would probably choose one that was slightly on the bright side.
Thanks so much for your time, it has really served to point me in some very thought provoking direction and will, I believe, help me to make a more confident discision.
Thanks for taking the time to write in response to my query. Your comments regarding the layout of accidentals has proved quite helpful. Because of the type of music I play on a regular basis I would definitely want to have a C# in both octaves and will therefore make sure I satisfy myself as to its availability. I have found upon reading that some makers do provide this in a modified Wheatstone layout but apparently it is not always so.
David,
Your exsperience with the Stagi is just what I am trying to avoid, so thanks for the heads up. I have now checked into both the edgley and tedrow concertinas and have been impressessed with what I saw. However, unlike you my hands are somewhat on the large side and I would probably opt for the one that had a little more finger room.