Daniel Hersh Posted November 6, 2007 Share Posted November 6, 2007 Here on eBay. I can't even decide whether I think it's British or German made. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdms Posted November 6, 2007 Share Posted November 6, 2007 Here on eBay. I can't even decide whether I think it's British or German made. I asked the seller to put up interior pictures, which he did--it appears to have inhaled large amounts of dust, but it looks English to my untutored eye. jdms Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel Hersh Posted November 6, 2007 Author Share Posted November 6, 2007 Yes, it does look English-made. Thanks! The action looks like it's Lachenal-style. Here on eBay. I can't even decide whether I think it's British or German made. I asked the seller to put up interior pictures, which he did--it appears to have inhaled large amounts of dust, but it looks English to my untutored eye. jdms Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel Hersh Posted November 10, 2007 Author Share Posted November 10, 2007 Still wondering about this one. An inquiry on eBay suggests that it's a Jones. Did Jones use this fretwork design? How about the action design? I think of that as being Lachenal-style, but don't know if other makers used it too. Yes, it does look English-made. Thanks! The action looks like it's Lachenal-style. Here on eBay. I can't even decide whether I think it's British or German made.I asked the seller to put up interior pictures, which he did--it appears to have inhaled large amounts of dust, but it looks English to my untutored eye. jdms Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nkgibbs Posted November 12, 2007 Share Posted November 12, 2007 Hi, It looks remarkably similar to this early Lachenal (no 7228). Neil Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Read Posted November 13, 2007 Share Posted November 13, 2007 I think we can be pretty certain it's not a Jones Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel Hersh Posted November 13, 2007 Author Share Posted November 13, 2007 (edited) Thanks! I imagine that's the answer. Daniel Hi,It looks remarkably similar to this early Lachenal (no 7228). Neil Edited November 13, 2007 by Daniel Hersh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now