Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Rami

Travel

Recommended Posts

It sounds Draconian, but hopefully it will be only a short-term measure? :unsure:

It is Draconian... as in Draco Malfoy! :ph34r:

 

Let me speculate on some of the implications of these sudden new rules:

1) With all the additional bags and items presumably going into hold baggage and no additional equipment or personnel (never mind
experienced
personnel) for examining it, security will be worse, not better.

 

2) Neither the government nor the airlines would seem to have been assigned any responsibility for loss or damage to items which people are suddenlyl forced to check.

 

3) Nor does there seem to be any requirement that airlines refund ticket purchases to individuals who cancel their travel, whether for fear own their own personal safety or because there's no point to the trip if they can't be
guaranteed
that certain of their possessions will arrive intact.

 

4) As for those who carried their valuable items with them on the outward flight and who now suddenly discover that they won't be allowed to do so on the return leg....
:angry:

 

5) Meanwhile, through this government edict, the would-be terrorists have already succeeded in causing a major dislocation to the air travel industry and damage to the psychological well-being of those who travel by air. (Tell an addicted traveler he can't fly, and he'll be angry. Tell him he can fly but then snatch away his security blanket as he boards the plane, and he may panic.)

 

With the prevalence of laptop computers in business use, and the risk of damage if they are sent as checked baggage, could this effectively shut down the business travel industry? And what about the super-discount airlines, for whom a large portion of their clientele deliberately travels with
only
carryons?

 

6) Meanwhile, the news announcement has made sure that any would-be bombers won't be caught in the act, since they've been warned that there's no point in trying today.

P.S. From what Stephen quoted, one may carry on "Prescribed medicines essential for the duration of the flight, except in liquid form unless verified as authentic." Verified? How? By whom? Is there some method that works on bottles labelled as prescription medicine that doesn't work on off-the-shelf bottles marked for contact-lens drops? Either one can be emptied and refilled.

 

Also allowed is "For those traveling with an infant: baby food, milk and sanitary items essential for the flight." So if you want to bomb a plane, carry with you an innocent infant and a bottle of high-explosive "baby formula"?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
All we'd have had left after they'd had a trip in the hold would be a pile of wood-chippings, a few reeds and some wire! :(

Is fiddle wire as dangerous as concertina wire? :unsure:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Also allowed is "For those traveling with an infant: baby food, milk and sanitary items essential for the flight." So if you want to bomb a plane, carry with you an innocent infant and a bottle of high-explosive "baby formula"?

 

Apparently they're making the parents taste the baby food/formula to prove it's not poison. Some of my online parent friends have said that once the formula has been unsealed and is open to the air, it's only good for an hour before it starts to go off and is unsafe to give to the baby. So that's an additional problem for parents on long flights..

Edited by Geraghty

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Let me speculate on some of the implications of these sudden new rules...............................

Blimey Jim! Can't you accept for just a moment that the security services just might be trying to do their best in a very difficult situation, might have some competence in doing their job, and can't you possibly give them the benefit of the doubt until it's proven misplaced?

 

- W

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So if you want to bomb a plane, carry with you an innocent infant and a bottle of high-explosive "baby formula"?
Apparently they're making the parents taste the baby food/formula to prove it's not poison.

As far as I know, most explosive liquids don't cause immediate death or even convulsions when ingested in small amounts. And if the person is already intending suicide (by being present when the bomb goes off), why should they care if it's poison? Or are they counting on the bomber being unable to suppress a grimace at the taste? B)

 

Meanwhile, here are some additions to the news:

Apparently, all European flights of less than 3 hours length going into Heathrow have been cancelled. Not Stansted, though, so it seems those who fly the cheap airllines are less inconvenienced by that than those who pay full fare.

 

And Tony Blair is currently vacationing in the Caribbean. Will they make all his security guys check their little electronic gadgets into the hold on the return flight?
:unsure:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Blimey Jim! Can't you accept for just a moment that the security services just might be trying to do their best in a very difficult situation, might have some competence in doing their job, and can't you possibly give them the benefit of the doubt until it's proven misplaced?

No.

 

Way too late for that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh well it looks like Ohio is going to have to do without my concertina over christmas. Or did they hear that I was going to take it :ph34r:

chris

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You may find that they will let you take your knitting on the plane - but not the needles?????

 

Or have they lightened up on that?

 

I called American Airlines yesterday, pushed buttons until I got to speak to a human, and she told me that yes, I can bring my knitting AND my needles on to the plane! She clearly did not approve, but oh, well.

 

As for my concertina, I'm still undecided. I don't have any reason to bring it, other than not to be apart from it for 5 whole days :( . Plus, I'm guessing my father would like to hear it, for about 5 minutes!

 

I should prolly start a new topic, but does anyone know of any good folk happening in Seattle this weekend?

 

On our last plane trip to Albany, Klari took both her concertina and her knitting needles on the plane, no trouble at all. Delta was the carrier.

 

Bob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Infuriating. It's all pointless window-dressing; the government 'seen to be taking action'. Totally ineffective but comforts the half-witted.

 

The whole business is very 1984; I can't help wondering if Blair is trying to keep people scared to keep their eyes off the ball in other areas.

 

I object to being inconvenienced like this. I'm old enough to remember the IRA at it's most active and my parents remember watching V1's flying overhead on the way to London and I'm damned if I'll allow the current small bunch of morons to put the frighteners on me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Infuriating. It's all pointless window-dressing; the government 'seen to be taking action'. Totally ineffective but comforts the half-witted.

 

The whole business is very 1984; I can't help wondering if Blair is trying to keep people scared to keep their eyes off the ball in other areas.

 

I object to being inconvenienced like this. I'm old enough to remember the IRA at it's most active and my parents remember watching V1's flying overhead on the way to London and I'm damned if I'll allow the current small bunch of morons to put the frighteners on me.

 

Dirge:

 

Took the words right out of my mouth. I couldn't agree more. However it's not limited to Blair. Same thing this side of the pond, only more so. (It's a lot bigger in size). To quote one of our most eloquent recent presidents: his term will emphasize "symbolism over substance". (Clinton)

 

Just to keep me on topic for this net I should say concertina somewhere. I occasionally drive around with one. No problems intra state, but I haven't tested going interstate, yet. I haven't gathered the courage.

 

Thanks

Leo

Edited by Leo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Infuriating. It's all pointless window-dressing; the government 'seen to be taking action'. Totally ineffective but comforts the half-witted.

 

The whole business is very 1984; I can't help wondering if Blair is trying to keep people scared to keep their eyes off the ball in other areas.

 

I object to being inconvenienced like this. I'm old enough to remember the IRA at it's most active and my parents remember watching V1's flying overhead on the way to London and I'm damned if I'll allow the current small bunch of morons to put the frighteners on me.

As somebody who's had the dubious pleasure of nearly being blown up twice by the IRA I'm not particularly concerned - I kind of believe if it's going to happen it'll happen - just fate/chance/luck or whatever.

 

Whilst this might all be a Blair/Bush scam/conspiracy, what would the security services do different from this if there were a genuine threat? Would it seem very different or would it look exactly like this? How can you tell it's a scam?

 

As for "ineffective" - what would be an effective approach?

 

- W

 

p.s. No, the IRA did not try to blow up my Concertina

 

Edited by Woody to add something about Concertinas ;)

Edited by Woody

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

[

 

As for "ineffective" - what would be an effective approach?

 

- W

 

An effective approach is to invade Afganistan and Iraq. Compromise the Pakistanis,

it's my understanding that they supplied the crucial warning.

 

Now to deal with Iran and support the Israelis, there's no easy way out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just to keep me on topic for this net I should say concertina somewhere. I occasionally drive around with one. No problems intra state, but I haven't tested going interstate, yet. I haven't gathered the courage.
I've taken mine on road trips around Illinois and to Indiana, Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Missouri, Arkansas, Oklahoma, Texas, Wisconsin, Minnesota, South Dakota and Wyoming. By plane they've made it to Pennsylvania, Texas, Washington and Arizona. I've never experienced damage, but I've been a bit fanatic about packing methods when checking them. I used to be able to take my medium-sized Chemnitzers/Bandonions as carry-on, but most domestic carriers have reduced the allowable size of carry-on baggage making that impossible. For my next trip, I'm taking my smallest Bandonion which just got a new case. I hope the recent "changes" in air travel security will not force me into checking it.
- W
Hmm... Maybe it is a Bush conspiracy after all...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I can't help wondering if Blair is trying to keep people scared to keep their eyes off the ball in other areas.

 

 

 

 

I object to being inconvenienced like this. I'm old enough to remember the IRA at it's most active and my parents remember watching V1's flying overhead on the way to London and I'm damned if I'll allow the current small bunch of morons to put the frighteners on me.

 

'Didn't your recent subway bombings scare you.'

 

'Well, you did something about the V!'s and IRA. Why not do something about the Islam

fascists? If you don't care for your life, at least support others, including Blair, to take on that bunch of morons . They are not morons, they are countries, they are killers and they are smart. '

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

if anyone is doing any travel relatively soon, make sure you can have carry ons. as of today, carry ons are banned on international flights out of london (and i'm not sure about in) because of an attempted / planned terrorist attack (the news is not very clear). i doubt they'll make exceptions for instruments. also, within the USA, any liquids or gels of any sort are prohibited, but i'm assuming everyone's concertinas are currently in solid form.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

for those of you who "object to being inconvenienced like this"......that stance may change if the day comes when you are viewing tv footage of devastated salvage crews diving for the unidentifiable partial remains of 8 or 10 thousand innocent people after a dozen or so commercial jetliners detonate over the ocean. the horrific implications of these events go just a wee tad beyond inconvenience to concertina geeks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Liquids and gells are prohibited on certain flights here, but the real problem is that anyone flying from here connecting via London (e.g. to UK, Ireland or Europe) will not be able to take hand luggage on from London.

I don't know what that means for anyone already in the air??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Furthering the conspiracy theory even more…has anyone else noticed how well-organised the authorities have been in producing detailed lists, thousands of clear plastic carrier bags and rolling out printed posters both sides of the pond outlining the emergency procedures in only a few hours. No hand-written notices as you might expect. So they were well-prepared for this.

Assuming that these 'plotters' have been under surveillance for some time, was it just a coincidence that the airports were thrown into total confusion 24 hours AFTER 'our Tony' had left the UK on his hols?

! :rolleyes: ....just a thought!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×