Clive Thorne Posted February 22 Posted February 22 Inspired by the tread about pad holes tapered on the reed side to ease any airflow constriction over the clamp/screw assembly: What effect would having a deeper hole have on tone, if any? The reason I ask is that, according to Colin Dipper,the "Drone" button ony my concertina would have originally had novelty effects on this button. These were long gone by the time I acquired it, so I got Colin to fit reeds for me. Anyway the hole for these reeds actually goes through the thickened area of the action board, where the rest of the buttons reside, so rather than the hole being say 3mm deep it is more like 6 or 7mm deep. Now the notes on this button work, but they have always been a bit "muffled" and less bright than the other notes on that side. I gather than inboard reeds generally do sound a bit different to the peripheral ones, and there's nothing I can do about that aspect, but will the deeper hole also affect the sound? Would opening up the underside of this hole, either tapered or stepped, help at all? What do you all reckon?
Jake Middleton-Metcalfe Posted Tuesday at 09:06 AM Posted Tuesday at 09:06 AM It is really hard to tell what the effect of opening up/counter boring/flaring the underside of the hole would be without doing an experiment. What thread did you see about that, I must have missed it? Could you post a link? I would be very interested to read it. I never experimented with this but I have seen it done on some Jeffries concertinas. The person who is most likely to have experimented with this is probably Colin Dipper. I only make that as a guess as he has tried many things over the years.
Alex West Posted Tuesday at 01:30 PM Posted Tuesday at 01:30 PM 4 hours ago, Jake Middleton-Metcalfe said: Could you post a link? Jake Here are a couple of threads - there may be more... Alex West
Clive Thorne Posted Tuesday at 10:49 PM Author Posted Tuesday at 10:49 PM That's the one that inspired my question Alex. Thanks for locating and pointing to it.
Chris Ghent Posted Wednesday at 06:46 AM Posted Wednesday at 06:46 AM While the inboard nature of the reeds probably accounts for the muffled sound it is also possible the chamber is not big enough. Novelty noises did not have much of a chamber and creating one big enough for reeds may have been tricky. Easily assessed by looking. I imagine Colin took this into account.
Jake Middleton-Metcalfe Posted Wednesday at 08:58 AM Posted Wednesday at 08:58 AM 2 hours ago, Chris Ghent said: While the inboard nature of the reeds probably accounts for the muffled sound it is also possible the chamber is not big enough. Novelty noises did not have much of a chamber and creating one big enough for reeds may have been tricky. Easily assessed by looking. I imagine Colin took this into account. Yeah I agree the inboard reeds always sound a bit different. It's quite interesting to consider that the people in that Jeffries workshop would have known something about flaring the air holes like that and known what the result would have been. It's just one of those bits of information that hasn't really been passed on.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now