Robin Harrison Posted November 18 Posted November 18 Bill and I recorded this today...............it's a 3 part waltz in 3/8 time. It's a wonderful tune........the recording was a bit experimental so Bill should have been close to the camera ( or me further away) and the table was unnecessary.................but after 37 takes we deemd it ok. We seem to have a sympatico way of playing so the 1st time through although there are 2 anglos playing, it sounds like one. 2nd time through I play a duet part and it becomes clearer. I have attached the sheet music with both parts and a link to the YouTube video. Hope you enjoy it. Robin Cheshire Waltz + 2nd part.pdf 12
SIMON GABRIELOW Posted November 20 Posted November 20 So cheerful to watch and hear..and well worth those '37 takes' ( to get it as you wanted🌝
Matt Heumann Posted November 20 Posted November 20 43 minutes ago, SIMON GABRIELOW said: well worth those '37 takes' ( to get it as you wanted) 🌝 I find that doing multiple "takes", stopping & starting the recorder makes it harder and more stressful than to let it keep recording, continue playing or moving about, and edit out all the "unwanted" stuff later. Much less flustering. Sometimes I'll play it over 12 times, but never stopped, just paused took a deep breath, and went on playing. Post production makes all seem like virgin footage. 2
Dan Worrall Posted November 20 Posted November 20 Nice tune and very nicely played, Robin! Do you know anything of the origin of that tune?
SIMON GABRIELOW Posted November 20 Posted November 20 16 hours ago, Matt Heumann said: I find that doing multiple "takes", stopping & starting the recorder makes it harder and more stressful than to let it keep recording, continue playing or moving about, and edit out all the "unwanted" stuff later. Much less flustering. Sometimes I'll play it over 12 times, but never stopped, just paused took a deep breath, and went on playing. Post production makes all seem like virgin footage. Yes I do that technique of multiple 'takes' myself, particularly in more tricky pieces; that's the advantage of recording performance, versus live, and that's why sometimes people get fussed over little mistakes in live set up ( not recorded or edited).. forgetting it is literally happening at that moment. Really ( live) performance is rather nice, I think when you hear the slight differences in playing, which are not cut out later on🌝
AndyNT Posted November 21 Posted November 21 18 hours ago, Dan Worrall said: Nice tune and very nicely played, Robin! Do you know anything of the origin of that tune? Its from a Joshua Gibbons manuscript - https://tunearch.org/wiki/Cheshire_Waltz
John Wild Posted November 21 Posted November 21 In the published book Lincoln Collections volume 1, i.e. the Joshua Gibbons manuscript, it is in the key of D. However, it is stated that the original key was C. In the book, it appears as the 1st of a tune set, paired with La Daphne Quadrilles. This tune is in A, and the original key is stated as G. These are the ABC notations in the original keys. Note the source = Village Music Project. X:84 T:Cheshire Waltz. JGi.084 M:3/8 L:1/16 Q:3/8=60 B:Joshua Gibbons MS,1823,Tealby,Lincs. Z:Village Music Project, R.Greig, 2009 K:C G2|e2efed|c2cdcB|A2B2c2|G4e2|f2e2d2|a2g2B2|d2c2c2|c4:| |:f2|egfedc|B2d2f2|egecGE|C2E2G2|F2A2e2|f2d2c2|B2dcBA|G4G2| e2efed|c2cdcB|A2B2c2|G4e2|f2e2d2|a2g2B2|d2c2c2|c4:| |:G2|E2G2c2|c2B2A2|B2d2g2|f4e2|f2e2f2|A2d2c2|B2c2A2|G4:| |:F2|E2G2c2|c2B2A2|B2d2g2|f4e2|f2e2f2|A2d2c2|cBAGAB|c6:| X:85 T:Daphne Quadrill. JGi.085, La M:6/8 L:1/8 Q:3/8=120 B:Joshua Gibbons MS,1823,Tealby,Lincs. Z:Village Music Project, R.Greig, 2009 K:G d|d2B gec|d2B GAB|cBc edc|c3{dc}B2d| d2B gec|d2B GAB|BAe edF|G3-G3:| |:B|A2Ae2d|(G3A3)|B2AB2d|B2{cB}A2B| A2Ae2d|G3A3|B2AB2^c|d3 DFA| dAd fed|d2^c Acd|eAg gfe|e2df2f| g2ge2e|a3d2f|B2ge2^c|d3"DC"d3:| The manuscript was transcribed into ABC notation as part of the Village Music Project. See this website: https://www.village-music-project.org.uk/
Roger Hare Posted November 21 Posted November 21 It's also in the VMP transcription of the William Hall Lister MS, which contains the additional information that the composer is Dalgetti - but I can't find any information about a composer called Dalgetti...🙁
gcoover Posted November 21 Posted November 21 I think it was Spiers & Boden who made this very popular about 10 years ago. Here's the always amazing John Spiers playing it on concertina: 3
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now