Rod Pearce Posted March 29, 2021 Posted March 29, 2021 Does anyone know the typeface /' size used by Lachenal for their later instruments, specifically the instrument number label? IT looks a bit like Times New Roman, but the tails on the round numbers aren't rounded enough I need to recreate the label which in not salvageable. The instrument serial number is 199655. Thanks in anticipation Rod
Don Taylor Posted March 29, 2021 Posted March 29, 2021 (edited) Could it be Caslon? I don't have a Lachenal image to compare against, but Caslon was a very common font in the UK before TR. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caslon Edited March 29, 2021 by Don Taylor typo 1
Rod Pearce Posted March 29, 2021 Author Posted March 29, 2021 Don Thanks for your reply..I have looked at the Caslon typeface, and I don't think it is that as the numbers don't look rounded enough. I have tried some examples using MS Word and have come up with a few that seem to fit pretty well. My favourite is Sans Serif, so I think I will go with that. 196655 Times New Roman 196655 MS Sans Serif 196655 Franklin Gothic medium 196655 Century
Peter Smith Posted March 29, 2021 Posted March 29, 2021 In the past, I have used Calibri (light) 196655 - but that also does not look quite right! I would be interested to know what others suggest. Peter
alex_holden Posted March 30, 2021 Posted March 30, 2021 They may have used the Victorian equivalent of one of these: https://www.customstampsonline.com/product/6-band-line-numberer To get a more authentic look, you might separate out the digits and jiggle them up and down a tiny bit so they aren't perfectly on the baseline. 1
Mike Jones Posted March 31, 2021 Posted March 31, 2021 The nearest typeface I can find is Lisong Pro , the seriphs are more like Lachenals than most I looked at, but as Alex Holden points out the numbers are perfectly in line so don't look terribly authentic
Rod Pearce Posted April 1, 2021 Author Posted April 1, 2021 Thanks Mike. I can't find Lisong Pro either but....................... How about this one? Clarendon Light BT. Wikipedia says it was created in 1845, so would have been around when the instruments were being made. I prefer it to my previous choice 1234567890 Clarendon Light BT
gcoover Posted April 1, 2021 Posted April 1, 2021 Have you tried the "What the Font" iPhone app? It's usually pretty good about suggesting typefaces, just be sure to take a photo of a piece of text with something that might be fairly distinctive, like the letters g, a, etc. Gary 1
Rod Pearce Posted April 2, 2021 Author Posted April 2, 2021 Gary Thanks for your suggestion. Unfortunately I don';t have the text to hand as it was ruined prior to renovation. I am going from memory and what I can see from pictures on the internet, If I can find one with enough numbers and definition I will try your suggestion. Regards Rod
David Barnert Posted April 2, 2021 Posted April 2, 2021 Note that the font examples presented in the above posts may not render accurately on all computer screens. I am using a Mac with up-to-date MacOS (11.2.3) and what is called Times New Roman appears as Helvetica (and, of course, Times New Roman is resident on my Mac), Franklin Gothic medium, Century, and Clarendon Light BT show as Times, and Calibri (light) shows as Helvetica Bold.
David Barnert Posted April 2, 2021 Posted April 2, 2021 Even though you don’t need a 4, you might search for a font that has this distinctive 4 in it: (Image taken from https://www.concertinamuseum.com/CM00283.htm.) The only font on my Mac that has the vertical slash at the right end of the 4 is Bodoni, but it is clearly wrong for other reasons. (Screen shot, not active font)
Jim2010 Posted April 3, 2021 Posted April 3, 2021 Maybe the method used to recreate the Lachenal English, number 60325 (1930s) [link below] could be used to produce other labels and the corresponding numbers 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0, which could be digitally manipulated (cut and paste) to create any necessary number. https://www.concertina.net/forums/index.php?/topic/19025-items-from-the-concertina-museum-page/&tab=comments#comment-179611
d.elliott Posted April 3, 2021 Posted April 3, 2021 I have tried many fonts, most of those above, but 'Special Elite in Bold' is the closest I have found. special elite.tiffspecial elite.tiff
Theo Posted April 3, 2021 Posted April 3, 2021 I have a hunch that an old manual typewriter might give the right appearance.
David Barnert Posted April 4, 2021 Posted April 4, 2021 5 hours ago, d.elliott said: I have tried many fonts, most of those above, but 'Special Elite in Bold' is the closest I have found. It certainly seems a reasonable match. But I notice Special Elite doesn’t have the flanged “4” that we see printed on the label of #6946, above, so there are likely other subtle differences between what Special Elite in Bold provides and what is found printed on Lachenal SN labels. I wonder if the thing to do isn’t to take or find photographs of Lachenal serial numbers until you have collected a 1, a 9, a 6, and a 5 (I’ve given you the 6 and 9, above) and then use photoshop to duplicate the 9 and the 5, make them all the same shade, size and resolution, put them in the right order and “jiggle them up and down a tiny bit” (as suggested by Alex) to make a printable label.
gcoover Posted April 4, 2021 Posted April 4, 2021 Adobe's Typeka Regular font is really close on the other numbers, only lacking the flange on the 4. Gary
Paul_Hardy Posted April 4, 2021 Posted April 4, 2021 Relevant fonts in use in the 19th Century include these: Ones with a serif on the 4 include Bell, Bodoni, and Goudy. I've used Bell before for an 'old' feel label (first cut in 1788). As others have said, the shapes used by Lachenal may not have been a standard general purpose font, but a specific numbers-only machine. If people want to know more about fonts and typefaces, I recommend "The Elements of Typographical Style" by Robert Bringhurst. A fascinating if eccentric read is "Stop Stealing Sheep & find out how type works" by Spiekermann & Ginger. These were on my bookshelf from years ago when I was programming typesetting of labels on digital maps, but both are still relevant. 1 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now