Jump to content
Little John

Reed physics - harmonics

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Don Taylor said:

In that case shouldn't I see a second set of harmonics starting at A5?

 

 

Yes, though it might be low amplitude. However, the harmonic series overlaps so much with that of A4 it would be difficult to spot it.

 

5 minutes ago, Don Taylor said:

... our brains are doing some tricks here.

 

Indeed. I am convinced that we perceive the fundamental from the harmonics. How else could you distinguish a man from a woman on the telephone? In the UK, the telephone system operates only between 300Hz and 3000Hz. How else can you "hear" a bass on a smartphone speaker?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Little John said:

Yes, though it might be low amplitude..

It would have to be a really low amplitude - I cannot see anything in Transcribe! that is not part of the fundamental's harmonic sequence, or:

 

2 hours ago, Little John said:

However, the harmonic series overlaps so much with that of A4 it would be difficult to spot it.

Is the harmonic series for a note that is exactly 1 octave higher than another (A5 over A4, say) a proper subset of the lower note's series?

 

If so, then that would explain why I cannot see any distinct overtones for the higher note.  If not, then I would expect to see a few distinct overtones - and I do not.

 

(Transcribe! has a feature that lets me mark the harmonic series for a selected note so it is possible to figure out if a sound is potentially an overtone of a lower note or if it is a distinct  sound).

 

Added later:  A quick visual comparison of two such harmonic series seems to show that the higher fundamental's series is a proper subset of the lower note's series.  So, that would explain why a higher sounding note is simply not heard or seen on a display like mine - it just adds to the amplitude of some of the harmonics of the lower note.

 

I guess that this is why a perfect octave sounds perfect.

 

 

Edited by Don Taylor

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, Don Taylor said:

Is the harmonic series for a note that is exactly 1 octave higher than another (A5 over A4, say) a proper subset of the lower note's series?

 

Yes. A fundamental of 100 Hz has harmonics at 

 

200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, 800, ...

 

The octave above, 200 Hz, has harmonics at

 

400, 600, 800, ...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, Don Taylor said:

I guess that this is why a perfect octave sounds perfect.

 

Indeed, as it’s true that a harmonic series built on ANY harmonic of a given fundamental will be a subset of the harmonic series of that fundamental, the interval between any two notes whose frequencies are in a ratio of small whole numbers will sound nice (there is great agreement between their overtones). This is what we forfeit when we tune to equal temperament, where nothing but the octaves are in rational number ratios.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, David Barnert said:

This is what we forfeit when we tune to equal temperament, where nothing but the octaves are in rational number ratios.

 

Indeed! I was interested to observe that the fourth harmonic was strong in both Don's and Alex's examples. The fourth harmonic is the major third, which in equal temperament is 14 cents sharp. This explains why 1/4 comma mean tone tuning makes such an improvement on the concertina - it brings the major third exactly in line with the fourth harmonic of the fundamental.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, Little John said:

The fourth harmonic is the major third

 

Most people would call that the 5th harmonic, counting the fundamental as the 1st harmonic. That way, the harmonic number is equal to the ratio of frequencies between the harmonic and the fundamental. See the figures here:

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harmonic_series_(music)#Frequencies,_wavelengths,_and_musical_intervals_in_example_systems

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, David Barnert said:

Most people would call that the 5th harmonic, counting the fundamental as the 1st harmonic.

 

I think scientists tend to do that, while musicians tend to use "fundamental" with the octave as the first harmonic. In other words, musicians treat "harmonic" as synonymous with "overtone", as in this definition of "harmonic" (the first to come up on a google search):

  1. 1. 
    MUSIC
    an overtone accompanying a fundamental tone at a fixed interval, produced by vibration of a string, column of air, etc. in an exact fraction of its length.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, Little John said:

 

I think scientists tend to do that, while musicians tend to use "fundamental" with the octave as the first harmonic. In other words, musicians treat "harmonic" as synonymous with "overtone", as in this definition of "harmonic" (the first to come up on a google search):

  1. 1. 
    MUSIC
    an overtone accompanying a fundamental tone at a fixed interval, produced by vibration of a string, column of air, etc. in an exact fraction of its length.

 

I'm both a scientist (Physics PhD) and a musician (obviously a concertina player: that's why I'm here). I might agree about calling 2f the first overtone, but not the first harmonic. But this is thread drift from the original subject of what harmonics there are and how they arise from the air flow over the vibrating reed.

 

I was recently contemplating the respective virtues of alternative temperaments for a new concertina, prompted by one particular equal temperament major third on one of my present concertinas sounding very harsh. But I eventually realised that other major thirds on the same instrument are much less harsh. That suggests that the harshness is due to the strengths of the various harmonics of the particular two notes; but I haven't got around to looking at their spectra.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, Richard Mellish said:

...

prompted by one particular equal temperament major third on one of my present concertinas sounding very harsh. But I eventually realised that other major thirds on the same instrument are much less harsh. That suggests that the harshness is due to the strengths of the various harmonics of the particular two notes...

 

Or (more likely, I would think), one of the reeds is a little out-of-tune.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, David Barnert said:

 

Or (more likely, I would think), one of the reeds is a little out-of-tune.

No, they're in equal temperament and therefore well away from "just" tuning, where the fundamentals are in perfect small-number ratios. And the particular third that sounds rough continued to do so after the instrument had a service including tuning.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I made a go at grabbing the waveform from my concertina (a brass reeded Lachenal) -- I was focused on the recording, so I hit D5 instead of A4, but this looks a bit different from the earlier post.   I'd say this is much more like a triangle wave + some extra modulation; you can see this in the power spectrum in that the even harmonics are down quite a bit relative to the odd ones.

stems1.png

spectrum1.png

Edited by DaveM

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A picture is worth much speculation and many posts.

The attached plot shows the pressure upstream of a vibrating free reed, with time on the Abscissa.  The reference is:

"Aerodynamic excitation and sound production of blown-closed free reeds without acoustic coupling: The example of the accordion reed"
Denis Ricot, Laboratoire de Me´canique des Fluides et d’Acoustique, UMR CNRS 5509, Ecole Centrale de Lyon, France; Rene´ Causse´ and Nicolas Misdariis
Institut de Recherche et Coordination Acoustique/Musique, UMR CNRS 9912,
1 place Igor Stravinsky 75004 Paris, France

 

The dotted line denotes the time the tongue opens, passing flush to the top of the reed plate as it moves away from the plate, and the dashed line denotes the time the tongue comes back down, closing the slot. 

You may notice that there are two pressure pulses, though they are very different in magnitude and shape.  As some have mentioned here, the ear/brain system is extremely sophisticated and has no trouble interpreting these pulses as different; i.e., there is only one periodic time associated with this wave form. 

I'm delighted by the interest shown here on free reed physics, and this thread is an illustration that all we humans need to each learn individually everything that other humans have likewise learned.  Although it's true that a very large number of such topics have been discussed on Concertina.net, and I presume the record is there for the searching, I understand that the thrill of such discussions of discovery through live discussion is irresistible.  In particular, Dana, Chris, Richard Morse, myself, and others participated in discussions of these topics in great detail, going back at least 17 years.  Not all of it is accurate, since just like here, it takes a while before correct understanding can be achieved, but there's much knowledge to be gleaned from those discussions. 

I can't hope to present all the information available in the scientific papers to this thread, because of it's wide range of concepts.  I will mention one detail that has not been discussed here, and that is the fact that, although the vibrating tongue vibrates mainly in it's first bending mode, the second mode vibration can often be measured, and more importantly, this first mode vibration itself involves overtones that are whole number ratios; aka harmonics.  Said in another way, the first bending mode, which consists of a node at the anchor point, with maximum amplitude at the tip, also contains harmonics that are unique to the tongue material and other parameters of the system.  This harmonic spectrum causes the tongue to move - as a whole - in a jerky motion in time, all the while maintaining the same x-dependency of the first mode transverse cantilever vibration.  Mathematically, that's because the x-dependency (tongue shape) and the time dependency (harmonics) are separable.  It's my hunch that these harmonics in tongue vibration contain the clue to why a tongue of one material, say steel, will produce a different sound than a tongue of say brass.  If not for these harmonics, why would the sound be any different?

Regards,
Tom
www.bluesbox.biz

Aero P, Rico.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, ttonon said:

The dotted line denotes the time the tongue opens, passing flush to the top of the reed plate as it moves away from the plate, and the dashed line denotes the time the tongue comes back down, closing the slot. 
 

Aero P, Rico.png

 

Hi Tom, thanks for your input. Is this measuring the pressure across the reed plate? What would the static pressure be if the reed was blocked off? I'm not totally sure I understand why it goes negative for part of the cycle.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...