Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
ritonmousquetaire

Nice videos on the Wakker Hayden duet by Jim Bayliss

Recommended Posts

On 7/12/2018 at 1:27 AM, Wolf Molkentin said:

 

Well, David, I‘m doing things like that from time to time deliberately, as I‘m not playing for dancers (and in fact this waltz is not the tune to demand a change of this approach IMO). 🤗

 

Why would a pairing of triple time and four-four not work in general then?

 

Best wishes - 🐺

 

I guess most of my playing is for dancing, and even when not, I strive for a sound that is danceable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, David Barnert said:

 

I guess most of my playing is for dancing, and even when not, I strive for a sound that is danceable.

 

but would we necessarily have to bother switching from one beat to a different one then?

 

 

Edited by Wolf Molkentin
added missing word

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, mdarnton said:

Can you restate that, please? I'm not understanding it.

 

If you should be referring to my last post: We had been discussing a pairing of a tune in triple time with one in regular time as suggested from my side, see above (on previous page).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/13/2018 at 11:30 PM, David Barnert said:

I guess most of my playing is for dancing, and even when not, I strive for a sound that is danceable.

 

On 7/14/2018 at 3:53 AM, Wolf Molkentin said:

but would we necessarily have to bother switching from one beat to a different one then?

 

On 7/14/2018 at 7:06 AM, mdarnton said:

Can you restate that, please? I'm not understanding it.

 

On 7/14/2018 at 5:40 PM, Wolf Molkentin said:

If you should be referring to my last post: We had been discussing a pairing of a tune in triple time with one in regular time as suggested from my side, see above (on previous page).

 

Sorry, Wolf, but I have to say I don’t understand it either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi.  I just discovered this thread and appreciate everybody's comments.  I'll say that the 46-key Wakker Hayden is a W-1 with 3 reeds placed in the center of the reed pans.  I now also have a 65 key WW-2 and hope to get around to some more uploads. 

   

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/25/2019 at 9:02 PM, Jim Bayliss said:

Hi.  I just discovered this thread and appreciate everybody's comments.  I'll say that the 46-key Wakker Hayden is a W-1 with 3 reeds placed in the center of the reed pans.  I now also have a 65 key WW-2 and hope to get around to some more uploads. 

   

I'd love to hear you play this 65 key WW-2! There aren't many players using such instruments out there, and given what you were able to get from that 46-keys WW-1 I'm really looking forward hearing what you can come up with!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...