David Barnert Posted July 14, 2018 Share Posted July 14, 2018 On 7/12/2018 at 1:27 AM, Wolf Molkentin said: Well, David, I‘m doing things like that from time to time deliberately, as I‘m not playing for dancers (and in fact this waltz is not the tune to demand a change of this approach IMO). ? Why would a pairing of triple time and four-four not work in general then? Best wishes - ? I guess most of my playing is for dancing, and even when not, I strive for a sound that is danceable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolf Molkentin Posted July 14, 2018 Share Posted July 14, 2018 (edited) 4 hours ago, David Barnert said: I guess most of my playing is for dancing, and even when not, I strive for a sound that is danceable. but would we necessarily have to bother switching from one beat to a different one then? Edited July 14, 2018 by Wolf Molkentin added missing word Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mdarnton Posted July 14, 2018 Share Posted July 14, 2018 Can you restate that, please? I'm not understanding it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolf Molkentin Posted July 14, 2018 Share Posted July 14, 2018 10 hours ago, mdarnton said: Can you restate that, please? I'm not understanding it. If you should be referring to my last post: We had been discussing a pairing of a tune in triple time with one in regular time as suggested from my side, see above (on previous page). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Barnert Posted July 19, 2018 Share Posted July 19, 2018 On 7/13/2018 at 11:30 PM, David Barnert said: I guess most of my playing is for dancing, and even when not, I strive for a sound that is danceable. On 7/14/2018 at 3:53 AM, Wolf Molkentin said: but would we necessarily have to bother switching from one beat to a different one then? On 7/14/2018 at 7:06 AM, mdarnton said: Can you restate that, please? I'm not understanding it. On 7/14/2018 at 5:40 PM, Wolf Molkentin said: If you should be referring to my last post: We had been discussing a pairing of a tune in triple time with one in regular time as suggested from my side, see above (on previous page). Sorry, Wolf, but I have to say I don’t understand it either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jody Kruskal Posted July 23, 2018 Share Posted July 23, 2018 Hi Wolf, I got it. Sounds like a good idea. Pair away, and I look forward to listening to it. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Bayliss Posted May 25, 2019 Share Posted May 25, 2019 Hi. I just discovered this thread and appreciate everybody's comments. I'll say that the 46-key Wakker Hayden is a W-1 with 3 reeds placed in the center of the reed pans. I now also have a 65 key WW-2 and hope to get around to some more uploads. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ritonmousquetaire Posted June 1, 2019 Author Share Posted June 1, 2019 On 5/25/2019 at 9:02 PM, Jim Bayliss said: Hi. I just discovered this thread and appreciate everybody's comments. I'll say that the 46-key Wakker Hayden is a W-1 with 3 reeds placed in the center of the reed pans. I now also have a 65 key WW-2 and hope to get around to some more uploads. I'd love to hear you play this 65 key WW-2! There aren't many players using such instruments out there, and given what you were able to get from that 46-keys WW-1 I'm really looking forward hearing what you can come up with! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now