Stefan Posted October 17, 2011 Posted October 17, 2011 Hello everybody, I´m looking for a 57 keys MacCann duet or a 55 keys where the right hand side goes down to C. If that exists. It should be a good player, possibly an Edeophone or an Aeola. I´m also interested in a Baritone, though I know they are very hard to find. Thank you very much Stefan
Ivan Viehoff Posted October 17, 2011 Posted October 17, 2011 a 57 keys MacCann duet or a 55 keys where the right hand side goes down to C. If that exists. The standard 55-key Maccann doesn't go down to C, so it would be a rare special one that did, or a very rare Baritone. Some early 57-keys don't go down to C either, so you do have to check. 57-keys only come up for sale occasionally. I decided I wanted one, and it took me a year to find one. 62-keys seem to be more common. As it happens, someone in Australia is trying to sell a very rare 55-key Baritone Maccann Aeola at the moment. There's a recent post about it here, but you'll have to register to read the full post. http://maccann-mccann.ning.com/ I presume it is the same as the one that failed to sell on ebay with a US$5000 starting bid back in July. http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Wheatstone-55Key-Baritone-McCann-Aeola-Concertina-/260820183356
Stefan Posted October 17, 2011 Author Posted October 17, 2011 Thank you Ivan for the valuable information. Do you know if 62 keys concertinas are much bigger than the 57 ones? I play standing up most of the time and want to keep the instrument light. Right now I have a Wheatstone 46 keys.
Geoff Wooff Posted October 17, 2011 Posted October 17, 2011 As a point of reference Stefan, my 57 MacCann metal ended Aeola weighs 1880 grams. This might give you an idea how much extra effort would be needed to play one standing up. Good luck with your search, Geoff.
Ivan Viehoff Posted October 18, 2011 Posted October 18, 2011 (edited) Do you know if 62 keys concertinas are much bigger than the 57 ones? I play standing up most of the time and want to keep the instrument light. Right now I have a Wheatstone 46 keys. The 62-key is materially larger and heavier than a 57-key because it goes down to A in the left hand, so you have 3 extra large reeds to fit in to the space. You can see the standard layouts here: http://www.concertin...or-FourthEd.pdf The 67 key takes you down to G. But although these standard layouts show the 62 and 67 as going down to C in the RH, it is not uncommon to find Maccanns in this size range with two or three extra low notes in the RH too. Personalised adjustments to the layout seem to become more common once you get into this top end of the market. There was also a Maccann in this size range on the market a couple of years ago that had had 3 extra low reeds retrofitted in the LH, I think right down to F, though at the cost of some accidentals. 62 key and 67 key seem to be the most desirable Maccanns in the market. These are the ones most often found built to the highest quality of build. Old pros used to play standing up, so they didn't consider instruments of this size too large for that. Some people have fitted neck-straps to make it easier. Instruments in the 60s are the sizes David Cornell, for example, feels are the essence of the instrument. By the time you get to the 81 key, that often tends to sell at a discount to smaller sizes as few people want one that big. They are huge. I think 57-keys are hard to source precisely because they are seen as the smallest one that gives you what most players feel they "need", though I do not recall seeing many 57-keys built as Aeolas, etc, (obviously they exist, Geoff above has one) whereas this seems to be much more common with instruments with keys numbers in the 60s. Edited October 18, 2011 by Ivan Viehoff
Geoff Wooff Posted October 18, 2011 Posted October 18, 2011 I did some "weight-training" recently with a 72key MacCann which was at least 1 kilo heavier than my 57. The 57 felt like a toy afterwards and I could see myself being able to play it standing up. Interesting information Ivan ! I noticed that the 72 key had much longer scale reeds in its bottom end than my Baritone English Aeola from the exact same period... could this be due to the available space or was it for shear sonority for the pro- musicians ??
Stefan Posted October 19, 2011 Author Posted October 19, 2011 Thanks again for the information. I weighed my 46 keys metal ended one, it has a little over 1400 grams. I guess I have to be patient to find a 57 keys. The baritone from austalia has been sold. Has anyone of you ever played or heard about another baritone? I guess they are extremely rare.
Geoff Wooff Posted October 19, 2011 Posted October 19, 2011 I notice that "Hobgoblin" in England have a 57key Aeola for sale. It looks very nice too.
Stefan Posted October 19, 2011 Author Posted October 19, 2011 It really looks nice. But the price not so. Isn´t that a little high?
Geoff Wooff Posted October 19, 2011 Posted October 19, 2011 It really looks nice. But the price not so. Isn´t that a little high? Yes I think that is a bit too much . I paid a lot less than that for mine, earlier this year, from a member of this Forum!
tony Posted October 19, 2011 Posted October 19, 2011 (edited) I notice that "Hobgoblin" in England have a 57key Aeola for sale. It looks very nice too. Hobgoblin is a franchised business, so it all depends on which outlet as to who owns and sets the prices for second hand goods. Edited October 19, 2011 by tony
Theo Posted October 19, 2011 Posted October 19, 2011 (edited) They also have a Lachenal 55 key in their London shop for £850 - at that price might be worth checking even if its just a stopgap to trade up from? Edited October 19, 2011 by Theo
Stefan Posted October 19, 2011 Author Posted October 19, 2011 I called them and someone of the staff checked, if it had a low-c on the right side. It didn´t. Still the price seems ok. But to me it doesn´t make much sense. I´m quite happy with my 46 keys, I played it for two and a half years now and it served me well. still I´d like to have these extra notes. I fancy, that with a good 57 keys, I don´t need another one. But well... two and a half years ago, I could not possibly imagine that I would be willing to pay so much money for a concertina...
Ivan Viehoff Posted October 21, 2011 Posted October 21, 2011 But to me it doesn´t make much sense. I´m quite happy with my 46 keys, I played it for two and a half years now and it served me well. still I´d like to have these extra notes. I fancy, that with a good 57 keys, I don´t need another one. But well... two and a half years ago, I could not possibly imagine that I would be willing to pay so much money for a concertina... Good. It's a thin market. Those who want to sell often fail to get an immediate buyer at the price they hoped for, and vice versa. You are in a good position to sit there and wait for the right one to come along at the right price.
Dirge Posted October 21, 2011 Posted October 21, 2011 two and a half years ago, I could not possibly imagine that I would be willing to pay so much money for a concertina... Excellent advice from Ivan and this is completely normal...
Geoff Wooff Posted October 22, 2011 Posted October 22, 2011 (edited) Regarding the possible availability of the different sized models of MacCann Duet I did a trawl through the Wheatstone Ledgers last night and this is what I found; I looked at the sizes of 56keys and larger, the smaller models are too numerous to count quickly. So, during the period 1910-1923 wheatstones made 55-56key = 55 instruments 58key = 91 62key = 54 67key = 96 72key = 33 81key = 48 In the next book 1923-1937 56key = 14 58key = 79 62key = 37 67key = 62 72key = 41 81key = 43 Total = 653 I would not guess at the attrition rates of old Concertinas but it could be suggested that half of these have perished and even more are still in Grandma's attic. How many were produced by Lachenal ? Possibly more than Wheatstones if serial numbers for the two companies are compared. It is interesting to see from these ledgers that the Duet enjoyed its biggest popularity during the 1920's and that by the beginning of the 1930's the Accordion was making the MacCann less popular and Wheatstones were producing more and more Anglos. The figures include all the 'specials' of 60,63,64,68,69,70 and 83 key models and maybe some of the Baritones too although some might be 'Crane' keyboards (before they designated different type numbers to these. In the middle to late 1920's there are some very fancy instruments with Gold fittings, Amboyna and Tortoise shell ends and some with different metal ends noted as 'White metal' or 'Brittania metal' and sometimes 'Silver plated'. Edited October 22, 2011 by Geoff Wooff
Dirge Posted October 22, 2011 Posted October 22, 2011 It is interesting to see from these ledgers that the Duet enjoyed its biggest popularity during the 1920's and that by the beginning of the 1930's the Accordion was making the MacCann less popular and Wheatstones were producing more and more Anglos. In the middle to late 1920's there are some very fancy instruments with Gold fittings, Amboyna and Tortoise shell ends and some with different metal ends noted as 'White metal' or 'Brittania metal' and sometimes 'Silver plated'. That's been my empirically observed impression; if you are offered a duet it is usually 'from the best period' or close. Of course they didn't start making them until, what, 1889? It makes buying a good Maccan very simple, there are no early instruments to be wary of and the numbers dropped right off in the 30's and on; only the small ones are down to a price. (Middle sized Cranes can be 'down to a price' of course if part of a Sally Army bulk buy). My 71 has dural ends and reed frames and is listed accordingly in the ledgers. It's extremely light for what it is but I suspect it of being more delicate than a normal one; reeds seem to start to buzz and stall on very little provocation.
Stefan Posted October 24, 2011 Author Posted October 24, 2011 A beautifully simple idea to count the Wheatstone ledgers, Geoff. Very interesting. So the 58key and the 67key are the most popular. I wonder why there is a gap in the 62keys.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now