QUOTE
QUOTE
The others simply play folk tunes, no matter how professional their skills are.
I'm sure there are piano players or accordion players in Irish tradition, who do the same, "jazzifying" or "classifying" Irish folk music, just like in every other culture. Niall does it on Anglo Concertina.
Many of us are delighted to "simply play folk tunes."
Or eat icecream. Or play jazz. Or compose original music. Or play for dances.
What does it have to do with Niall's unquestionalble originality?
QUOTE
Nor do we call them folk tunes. They are traditional tunes.
Are you sure you are not mixing things?
Traditional music may or many not include folk tunes. Church music, Ceremonial and Wedding music are all traditional, but not necessarily folk. Dance music, songs, ballads may be folk, but not necessarily traditional.
QUOTE
They are all composed by such sophisticated musicians as Charley Lennon, Paddy O'Brien, and Paddy Fahey.
Traditional music can't be composed by a modern sophisticated composer. You are clearly mistaken here.
QUOTE
Can you play tunes by Paddy Fahey on your concertina?
Probably, but not so well as the notables below, with exception of William Kimber, whose playing I don't find inspiring.
Noel Hill, Tim Collins, Dympna O'Sullivan, William Kimber
, Scan Tester. QUOTE
In fact, most if us would say they prefer not to have traditional tunes "jazzed up" or "classified up" in a teeth-grinding fashion in the first place, whatever the player's "professional skill."
I understand and agree mostly, having grown up and been forced to listen to jazzed-up and "classified" Russian Folk music, while traditional Russian music was banned.
QUOTE
Niall is a great player. His expertise is unquestionably of the highest caliber. But there is much more to making good music than technical expertise or the study of jazz theory.
Which, to my opinion, Niall demonstrates flawlessly.
QUOTE
Saying that "His playing is real break through for the Irish tradition." shows a lack of understanding of the tradition. Niall fits well within it
It's your opinion, and I disagree with it. I think he is way ahead of all the rest "I" heard in his innovations, whether you happen to like it or not. He simply can't be "within" the tradition, while at the same time moving it ahead. He is "leading" the tradition. He is "ahead" of it. A master can't be within a school, Master
IS a school.