Some random and intentionally unidentified quotes from the
Morris Dance Discussion List on this subject in the last 24 hours:
QUOTE
QUOTE
Surprisingly, there is no definition of a 'sword'. It seems reasonable that if it hasn't a sharp edge, it isn't a 'real' sword for the purposes of the Act.
While it certainly seems reasonable to say that this legislation is aimed at weapons and that weapons are likely to be sharpened, what gets enforced is the specific *wording* that was used in the legislation. I suggest that it would be a mistake to assume that the wording used makes clear the suggested distinction.
QUOTE
In any case, the definition of historical re-enactment (/"conduct from a particular time or period in the past")/ pretty clearly covers traditional dances - of any ethnic origin.
I disagree, and anyone seeking to counter your argument need only look at how often people in this very list argue that what they do is living tradition and *not* just some historical relic.
QUOTE
From the Squire-elect of the the Morris Ring via the Bagman of Bathampton Morris:
QUOTE
Hi everyone,
Following a suggestion ... that the petition was "probably behind events", I've delved a bit deeper and found that the legislation has already been implemented without the general restriction on swords. According to the Squire-elect of the the Ring:
"A Statutory Instrument under the 1988 Criminal Justice Act came into force on 6 April 2008 banning curved swords with a blade more than 50 cms long. The petition is incorrect on the facts and the effects. There is a possibility that Plymouth Morris Men could be affected because they use cutlasses in a non traditional way. Cake bearers, if they use curved swords, could probably claim exemption on the basis of historical re enactment. Likewise the captain of Grenoside. So, in all, the effect on us is miniscule."
QUOTE
I signed the petition because it seemed to me that - whatever the wording of the relevant earlier Act - it will be interpreted in many instances by people who don't have detailed knowledge of these particular laws but do speak English. They'll hear the term 'Sword dancing' and immediately think of Scottish claymores, they'll see there's going to be a performance of a Longsword Dance and become concerned, because it's performed with swords and they're long and being waved around in public places; even if the explanation that Rapper is a double-handed implement made with flexible metal isn't likely to help. Most people aren't familiar with English traditional dances, but they do know what a sword is - and telling them (or even letting them see) that the dance ones are different, not edged or pointed, is knowledge that's likely to arrive too late. A display may well have been forbidden or even interrupted as it takes place.
But, if there's specific reference in the Act to Sword dances, longsword or rapper, it ceases to be something that will have to be explained in every case, but will at least be there for Festival or Display organisers and Dance Teams to cite. It's far better - it seems to me - to have particular instances in an Act in writing than to have to keep interpreting from a more general definition.