QUOTE(daviseri @ Nov 19 2004, 03:41 AM)
...i think i need something light, but want the range of a 48 key.
Morse concertinas (
Ceili anglo,
Albion English) are the lightest, in my experience. I recommend them.
QUOTE
...anglo seems as though it may be more difficult to pick up and master the push and pull notes.
Considering what you do, you're probably more aware than most people of how you would react to such a factor. You should probably go with your intuition.
QUOTE
I was told there was a tradition of clowns playing english.
Here in Denmark -- and I think generally in continental Europe -- most people think of the conceritna as "the clown's instrument", but most people also seem to be aware of only the anglo kind. Having said that, I know personally only two persons who use(d) concertinas in clowning (one currently, one formerly), and they both play English. I think you should just use what's most comfortable for you, especially since it looks like the rest of your act isn't stereotypical.
QUOTE
Is a Stagi a decent instrument for a beginner to start on?
A Stagi English? Yes. But in my opinion the Morse
Albion is far superior, though less than the full 48-button range. (There are various models of Stagi anglo, some more "adequate" than others.)
QUOTE
I assume Treble is lower than a Tenor in pitch?
No. That's backwards. The tenor English concertina goes a fifth lower than the treble. ("Tenor" isn't a term normally used in describing/classifiying other kinds of concertina.) And the baritone is lower than the tenor.
QUOTE
My voice is a baritone voice. I see they make baritone pitch concertinas. Would that probably be easier for me to sing to than a treble?
Not necessarily. It depends a lot on what sort of accompaniment you try to use. If you're going to duplicate the voice line on the concertina, most people would say that it should be in a
different octave from your voice, though I don't think that should be a hard and fast rule. If you're doing other sorts of accompaniment, then I think it's very much up to you.
The baritone English concertina is an octave lower than the treble English. I was surprised to discover that the baritone Morse
Albion is exactly the same small size and light weight as the treble
Albion. If you do think the baritone range is what you want, I would suggest that as the way to go.
QUOTE
What about Duet concertinas. What makes a duet different than an English?
For more information, you should check out
this page of the concertina FAQ. But basically, the English has a single scale in which consecutive notes alternate between the ends, while each of the duets has a separate full scale on each end, with the left-hand range lower than the right, and a bit of overlap.
QUOTE
I hear the Hayden is easy and intuitive to pick up the fingering for a novice, but is probably too heavy to play standing up for long periods. I also read that the other duet fingering systems are complicated to master.
The geometric regularity of the Hayden may make it easier to get started on, but I think
mastery is a very different matter. Each duet had advantages or disadvantages for different types or pieces of music. You might want to read Robert Gaskins'
comparison of Hayden and Maccann systems. I don't agree with all of his conclusions, in part because I think he takes a too limited musical perspective, but he does show that from at least one perspective the "superiority" of the Hayden is debatable. The Crane duet has its own regularity, but it's a different
sort of regularity from the Hayden. The Maccann and Jeffries layouts also have underlying principles, but they're not as rigidly geometric as the Hayden. My own experience suggests that if you can become comfortable with one of the duets, you could become comfortable with any of them.
You haven't told us what instruments you already play, if any. That could be relevant. For me the English was most natural, and I suspect that's partly because I had previously played instruments that could play only one note at a time (trumpet, tin whistle, etc.). Unlike piano players, I wasn't used to playing a different part with each hand; in fact, I found that whole idea difficult. On the other hand, splitting the low and high ranges between the two hands on the duet concertinas seems more natural to those who already play piano.
If you do decide the duet concept is more to your liking, availability of both instruments and instruction material may affect your choice of which duet.
Some arrangements for the Maccann are available, and if you're lucky you might be able to get a copy of an old tutor. I know of one tutor for the Crane and none for either Jeffries or Hayden. However, if you're the sort who likes to teach himself through experimentation, that may not matter.
Currently the Stagi Hayden is the only duet readily available as a new instrument, and it has a reputation for being heavy and awkward. I think Bob Tedrow has made a couple of Haydens now, so you might be able to order one from him, much better quality than the Stagi, though I assume more expensive. The Morse Hayden should be coming "soon". (Recent Wheatstone and Dipper Haydens exist, and would be far more comfortable to play, but there hasn't been new production from them in years, and people who have them aren't selling them.) No one is currently making Crane, Maccann, or Jeffries duets, but vintage Cranes and Maccanns of different sizes/ranges are frequently available. I think a 55-button Lachenal
New Model or Wheatstone
Ĉola duet (Crane or Maccann) might meet your demands for both range and weight.
And if you have a new instrument made -- whichever kind, -- I'm pretty sure that any of the current makers (Morse, Tedrow, Geuns-Wakker) would be willing to do one with bright red bellows and ends, if you request it.
Good luck!