Jump to content


Replies To Mr. James Plamondon

  • Please log in to reply
1 reply to this topic

#1 allan atlas

allan atlas

    Chatty concertinist

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 401 posts

Posted 27 August 2003 - 06:05 PM

GOOD FOLKS: Having only recently figured out how to access and -- more significantly -- respond to postings on the new forum site, I am preparing a response to some of the recent postings by James Plamondon. More specifically, I will be responding to (1) his queries about why the concertina lost popularity (about which I believe he is way off base); (2) his notions about meantone tuning and the layout of the buttons on the English concertina; and (3) his somewhat -- what shall I call them? -- unfair charges that the CSFRI is "hiding" its collection of English concertina music from the Victorian period.

I hope to get to it all either tomorrow or the next day (by the weekend at the latest).


Edited by allan atlas, 27 August 2003 - 06:10 PM.

#2 James Plamondon

James Plamondon


  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 16 posts

Posted 28 August 2003 - 08:24 AM

Dear Dr. Atlas, et al.,

I assure you that I did not mean to "charge" CSFRI with anything, and apologise for giving any offense. Quite the contrary, I stated that I must be missing something -- as indeed it appears that I am.

Hopefully, your reply will tell me what I was missing. :-)

Similarly, I am confident that you will be able to dispell my wayward guesses about why the concertina lost its popularity.

I particularly look forward to your thoughts on the English concertina's timbre and tuning, which I suspect would benefit from scholarly consideration.

I sincerely appreciate your taking the time to respond to my inquries. I did not expect them to be addressed by such an illustrious member of the concertina community as yourself.


James Plamondon
Abashed Newbie

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users